|
In addition to causing a huge humanitarian catastrophe,
the NATO bombing has unleashed an environmental
catastrophe, with untold health consequences to come,
not only in the environment of the FRY but in the whole
of the Balkans. Dr. Nias, of the worldwide Fund for
Nature, believes that a minimum of 10 million people
will be affected‹resulting in an environmental
catastrophe greater than Chernobyl. As a part of my
professional career, I have studied the anatomy of
catastrophic nuclear and non-nuclear accidents such as
Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, Bhopal, Challenger, Piper
Alpha, and the others. As a member of the National
Academy of Sciences Committee, I studied the oil spills
such as Exxon Valdez. These were, however, all man-made
accidents. The Turkish 7.4 quake set an oil refinery
ablaze, disrupted water and power supplies, flattened
overpasses, etc. Earthquakes are, however, natural
phenomena. In case of NATO ecocide we are dealing with
deliberate and calculated poisoning of the human
habitat. According to NATO, targeting encompasses an
environmental assessment. Hence, the consequences should
have been known.
Almost daily attacks on the and chemical, petrochemical,
pharmaceutical plants, plastics factories, refineries,
fuel storage tanks, and the electric power grid, as well
as the use of depleted uranium (DU) weapons, have
resulted in large releases to the environment of various
substances with carcinogenic, mutagenic, toxic, and
other perilous consequences to human life, plants, and
animals. Large quantities of ammonium and ammonium
elements, oil and oil derivatives, acids, and alkali
leaked into rivers‹including the Danube River destroying
aquatic flora and fauna. The Danube is partially dead,
although it provides drinking water for some 10 million
people.
Thus, we are talking about chemical and radiological
warfare banned under the Geneva Convention and by the
International Court. It is also a violation of the 1992
Rio Declaration on the Environment and Development,
which explicitly protects the environment during war
conflicts. This is also a hideous stain on the moral
standing of the U.S. and its NATO allies.
Chemical Releases
The chemical substances released include but are not
limited to: vinyl-chloride manomer (VCM) chlorine,
chloro-carbon hydride, mercury, cadmium, hydrocarbons,
ammonia, nitrogen and sulfur oxides, benzene,
phosphorous compounds, dioxins, PCB's, and hydrogen
halides. These chemicals are highly toxic, and
carcinogenic. Destruction of electric power relay
stations led to release of the highly toxic chemical
piralen. A large number of people had to be treated for
poisoning. City of Pancevo and its surroundings were
affected most.
Pancevo
NATO destroyed 3 major industrial plants with bombs and
missiles: City Refinery, Petrohemija petro-chemical
plant, and Azotara fertilizer nitrogen processing plant.
The strikes on Pancevo, a city of 150,000 near Belgrade,
leave a dreadful legacy. The fires raged for 10 days.
The cloud of smoke was more than 10 miles long. The sun
was blotted out for a day. 100,000 tons of various
carcinogens were released into the air, water, and the
soil. 1,500 tons of VHM were released. Shortly after
the strike on Azotara, on April 18, levels of VHM not
only rose 10,600 normal, but rains north of the city
carried VHM, poisoning the land and the crops of grain
and fruit [Vasovic, 7/1/99].
15,000 tons of ammonia and associated substances were
poured into the Danube, Europe's most important waterway
that runs almost 2,000 miles through 11 countries, which
are already heavily polluted. This was necessary to
avert a Bhopal-type of accident. Fishing was barred
downstream of Pancevo. Potentially, more deadly is
contamination with heavy elements and‹mercury in
particular sweeping the poison downstream into the Black
Sea. Over 100 tons of mercury was released. Cadmium and
Zinc have also leached into the Danube. More than 1,000
tons of ethylene dichloride, 800 tons of hydrogen
chloride, 250 tons of liquid chlorine, 1,000 tons of
sodium hydroxide, and a vast amount of dioxin were also
spilled [G, 7/9/99].
The Serbian government imposed a 60-day moratorium on
publishing environmental information since June 9. They
are doing that for fear of those who are affected, and
for fear of facing pressure to do something. On the
other hand, they themselves are aware that they are not
competent, nor can they do anything [Vasiljevic,
7/1/99]. In addition, the regime wanted to reassure
people that the country is returning to normality.
Nonetheless, farm workers have developed rashes that
burn and blister. Those who eat the river fish and
vegetables or drink the tap water come down with
diarrhea, vomiting, and stomach cramps. Miscarriages
have doubled.
Fears of birth effects are tormenting pregnant women.
Mark Fineman [LAT, 7/6/99] stated that physicians
recommend that all women who were in town on April 18
avoid pregnancy for at least the next 2 years. Women who
were less than 9 weeks pregnant were advised to obtain
abortions. Most did comply. Pancevo pro-democracy mayor,
Srdjan Milkovic, said: "Only in the next 2 years or 20
can I tell you the full consequences ... I am afraid you
will find a lot of our people in the oncology ward
fighting cancer, or perhaps in the hematology department
or center for respiratory diseases, or perhaps in the
morgue. But for today, it's enough to worry just how to
get through the summer and the cold winter that lies
ahead."
Chris Hedges [NYT, 7/14/99] called NATO officials in
Mons, Belgium who told him that the environmental damage
caused by the attack was taken into consideration. "When
targeting is done we take into account all possible
collateral damage, be it environmental, human, or to
civilian infrastructure. Pancevo was considered to be a
very, very important refinery and strategic target, as
important as tactical targets in Kosovo." It is apparent
that NATO showed disregard for human life and the
environment. If the refinery was strategic, which the
war developments do not seem to corroborate, why were
the petrochemical plant and the fertilizer plant bombed?
Other Towns
Other places have been affected, such as Novi Sad,
Kragujevac, Kostolac, Lazarevac, Nis, Belgrade, and
Smederevo. The water supply of Novi Sad was contaminated
after 30 fuel tanks and the refinery were hit and spewed
oil. Novi Sad streets were drenched with slimy, soothed
rainwater. Even vast quantities of fire-extinguishing
foam needed to dose the 11-day blaze pose their own
ecological threat.
The destruction of high voltage transformers unleashed
highly poisonous PCB's into the water supply of
Kragujevac. Some of the transformers used the highly
toxic and cancerous coolant piralen, one liter of which
can poison four million liters of water [Vasovic,
7/1/99].
DU
NATO has been using armor-piercing shells loaded with
the DU fired by A-10 anti-tank aircraft [BBC, 5/7/99]
and possibly Tomahawk Cruise missiles. The Serb sources
reported that 150 shells were dropped on Belgrade alone,
and many more in Kosovo. NATO insists use by A-10 in
Kosovo only. John Pike, a respected defense analyst,
estimated that 10,000 of DU rounds was fired in Kosovo
[Mother Jones, 7/5/99]. Amazingly, a large number of
rounds, were fired at the Devil's Rocks near
Vranje, which is a desolate place. Presumably, it was
done for rock penetration testing purposes [Vukmirovic,
7/11/99].
DU, a waste product of uranium enrichment, is
essentially a radioactive waste 1.7 denser than lead. As
a waste product, it costs nothing. Its kinetic energy is
sufficient to penetrate tank armor or concrete bunkers.
It is both radioactive and toxic. It has been previously
used in Iraq and Bosnia. Pentagon also confirmed that it
has no plans to clean it up, despite the presence of
NATO troops! Thus the hazard to Kosovo civilians and
NATO troops is ignored. The National Radiological
Protection Board advises press and relief agencies to
avoid contaminated areas [BBC, 8/15/99]. DU clean up is
difficult and costly. The top layer of soil - roughly
one foot deep - would have to be removed and disposed.
Upon impact, the DU core partially ignites producing
uranium oxide in particulate of between 0.5 and 5
microns. Mobile aerosol spreads over several hundred
miles, depending on wind conditions. If inhaled or
ingested, it stays in the body 10 or more years (it does
not decay) irradiating the tissue around it. One "hot
particle" in the lungs is equivalent to one chest X-ray
every hour of every day for the rest of one's life. It
is impossible to remove - slow irradiation takes place
resulting in radiation sickness and premature death. The
uranium oxide goes into the soil as well. DU's chemical
toxicity presents even greater danger to human health in
the short term after exposure. The kidney is the target
organ. DU is incorporated into the farmland; picked up
by vegetables; and children can handle the shrapnel.
According to the Pentagon, 400,000 American and British
soldiers were exposed to this DU aerosol in the Gulf
War. About 200,000 of them have sought medical care
since the war and about 115,000 have been diagnosed as
having Gulf War Syndrome. Hari Sharma, of the University
of Waterloo in Ontario, predicted an increase of 20,000-
100,000 fatal cancers in veterans and Iraqi citizens. A
Russian Army's expert says they have contracted the
disease and abnormalities at the genetic level. An Iraqi
pediatric oncologist claims that childhood leukemia has
risen 600% in areas of Iraq where DU was used.
Stillbirths, birth or abortions of fetuses with
monstrous abnormalities, and other cancers in children
born since 1991 have also been found. In 1996, the DU
issue was brought up before the UN Human Rights Tribunal
in Geneva. The Tribunal condemned it and called it a
weapon of mass destruction. Dr. Sharma has written to
all NATO heads of state asking them to eliminate DU
munitions from their arsenals.
Needless to say, the Pentagon denies that the DU used in
Kosovo will pose any danger. However, in addition to Dr.
Sharma, Doug Rokke is one of the biggest critics of the
Pentagon. Rokke, a health physicist, was in charge of DU
decontamination after the Gulf War in Iraq, Kuwait, and
Saudi Arabia. Within 2 weeks upon return, Rokke and
other team members began developing health problems. In
the 8 years since, some have died and most developed
health problems. Rokke himself has had severe kidney and
respiratory problems. A urinalysis, conducted 3 years
later, showed uranium level 2,000% higher than normal.
"The Department of Defense doesn't want to admit that DU
is harmful because they don't want the liability." It
appears that revelations about "friendly fire" forced
the Pentagon to admit use of DU during the Gulf War
[MondD, 7/2/99].
Rev. Jesse Jackson characterized the U.S. Navy's bombing
at a training center on a Puerto Rico island of Vieqes
as "un-American" because it violates the human rights
of the island's 9,300 residents. Jackson called the Navy
position "colonialism."
Beyond FRY
Romania reported acid rain. The pH level of acidity of
the rain stood at 5 instead of the level of 7. In many
towns in the southwestern region, crops and forests had
been damaged and leaves had fallen from trees. Vineyards
and crops in the southern region had also been damaged.
The World Wildlife Fund and a Romanian laboratory will
monitor a 120 mile stretch of the Danube around the Iron
Gates, a hydroelectric dam that forms a border between
Yugoslavia and Romania [AP, 7/8/99].
Bulgarian farmers near the towns of Kula and Belogradcik
reported that flowers fell from fruit trees and
vegetables began to rot on their land. Measurements of
pollutants in Northern Greece showed rising levels of
dioxin on the days the wind blew south. In Macedonia,
radiation levels had risen 8 times over. Moldavia and
Ukraine are affected as well.
UNEP
Teams from the UN Environmental Program (UNEP) and the
UN Agency for Human Settlements in Yugoslavia have
already sent a report to Kofi Annan warning of
miscarriages, birth defects, and incurable diseases of
the nervous system and liver. The UNEP report, which
leaked to the Dutch A&P press agency [AusRa, 6/24/99],
paints a picture of the disaster surpassing the
Chernobyl nuclear accident in 1986.
Another UNEP 12-member team for Yugoslavia headed by
Pekka Haavisto - Finland's former environment
minister - completed a 10-day mission to targeted sites in
Serbia and Kosovo and will return for two more weeks at
the end of August. The team is taking air, water, and
soil samples. It will deal with the DU issue as well.
The team is scheduled to present its findings in a
report to Kofi Annan in early October. At that point in
time, the report will be made public. It will be then up
to Annan to decide on a future course of action. The
State Department is waiting for the final report.
Haavisto believes that the most dangerous moment was
probably during the fires when the smoke was in the
air. It is unclear how much is in the soil. A lot of
mercury, asbestos and other toxic substances were found
in the soil. The biggest danger is the ground water and
the Danube. "If the clean-up were to begin tomorrow it
would take several years to complete."
The NYT has already latched on Haavisto's statement; "We
talk about chosen hot spots where immediate action has
to take place, but not about a major ecocide or country-
wide catastrophe", to downplay the consequences: "Team
finds NATO bombing left few environmental woes" [NYT,
7/28/99]. CNN did the same.
FOCUS
A team of Russian, Greek, Austrian and Swiss experts,
representing the FOCUS countries, issued a preliminary
report on August 14. The principal conclusion is that
Yugoslavia faces ecological disaster unless urgent
measures are taken in the worst affected areas to
prevent a "possible environmental collapse". Pancevo
tops the list, followed by Novi Sad, Smederevo,
Pristina, Nis and Bor.
Some 8 tons of mercury had seeped out from the
electrolysis plant in Pancevo posing a danger to human
health and the environment in the Danube basin. "The
release of petroleum, oil, diesel and fertilizers into
the soil and water reservoirs has resulted in the
contamination of nearby facilities, towns, villages,
water and mud in channels and rivers, including the
Danube. This could result in changes in the ecological
balance in the region and irreversible mutation in
plants and animals."
|